Harpswell Information

There is navigation info at bottom of page

Site
Sections

Home
Gen info

 Coastal
   Lobster
   Groundfish
 General
 Internet
 News
 Comments
 Webskipper

Issues

 Charter
 Conservatiom

 Global
   warming
 
 Libraries
 Prop tax
 Schools
 Skipper's
  Choice
Sustainability
 Waterfront
Regional
  Housing
  Open Space
Photo
Search Site

LNG
Sections

Comments
Comments2
Comments3
Fairwinds

Fast Facts
Files
FAQ
Links
Links to        Places
Int. Facts
Money
LNG news
Overheard
What's new


Contact
Webskipper

Submit a Comment
to the Web Skipper

Report a

Bad Link

 

Friends of Casco Bay raises questions re. Liquefied Natural Gas

 

In late September 2003, Fairwinds announced its proposal to build a liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal in Harpswell. Friends of Casco Bay (FOCB) immediately began to identify potential environmental issues. We have been working diligently, behind-the-scenes and in public forums, ever since to educate ourselves, the public, and Fairwinds about possible environmental threats to Casco Bay.

In October 2003, we posted a four-page list of environmental concerns regarding the proposed project on our website (www.cascobay.org). We linked to community websites such as www.harpswell.info. We have shared the list with Fairwinds engineers and environmental specialists in an effort to mitigate environmental impacts on Casco Bay.

FOCB has spent hundreds of hours researching issues and meeting and talking with Harpswell residents, Fairwinds representatives, and other stakeholders to discuss potential threats to the water quality of Casco Bay. We have spoken with proponents and opponents alike and consulted with other waterkeepers and environmental advocates who have had experience with LNG facilities in other harbors.

Early on, Friends of Casco Bay expressed concern about potential wastewater discharges from the site. We raised issues about wastewater from the tankers and attending vessels, as well as from vessels used during the construction phase. We opposed a desalination facility and a sewage treatment plant if their discharges would enter the Bay. While we have not received assurances that these facilities will not be on site, the lease that Harpswell residents will vote on March 9th now states that there will be no discharges from the site or from ships into Harpswell waters. We regard this as a promise that Fairwinds will guarantee that no wastewater of any kind will be discharged from the site, either from a desalination facility, sewage treatment plant, or from LNG ships or other vessels, during or after construction. Should the lease be approved, we will continue to demand assurances that absolutely no discharges from LNG activities will occur anywhere in Casco Bay.

Other environmental issues still remain. We are told these will not be addressed until the project moves into the next phase. At that time, Fairwinds will have to commission an environmental impact study and apply for permits and review from state and federal agencies. Questions remain regarding: heavy Bay use for the transport of people and materials during construction, the type of biocide in the bottom paint on the LNG tankers, anti-fouling agents on piers and pipes, the impact on marine habitats around the facility from a pier extension, air quality issues especially from LNG ship exhaust, stormwater runoff, and most importantly, the impact on Casco Bay of an underwater pipeline.

Fairwinds has stated that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), not Fairwinds, will decide whether the pipeline has an overland or an underwater route. As the ombudsman for the Bay, Friends of Casco Bay will advocate for an overland route. We think there may be a way to run the pipeline underground up Route 123 without interfering with private property rights. If that is possible, it would avoid all of the potential impacts of putting a pipeline in the Bay. If, however, an underwater pipeline is decided upon, we will provide input on placement of every section and fight to ensure minimal impact on marine habitats and resources. We will require that the environmental impact study address potential disruption to marine ecosystems and fisheries. We will support a requirement that a comprehensive circulation study, turbidity and sedimentation analyses, and many other data collection activities be part of the pre-permitting phase. We will advocate for shellfish/lobster population enhancement projects to mitigate any displacement of resources from laying an underwater pipeline. We will watch the regulatory permitting process closely and intercede on behalf of the Bay wherever and whenever necessary.

 

Although the citizens of Harpswell have a number of issues to take into account, including economic, safety, and social considerations, FOCB’s focus is on the environmental impact on Casco Bay. We have identified marine environmental issues and made that information available. Fairwinds will be required to address these issues. If the project passes, we will continue to request, persuade, or push state and federal agencies, as well as Fairwinds, to have our questions answered.

Since our expertise only allows us to deal with a subset of all the issues involved with siting an LNG facility, it is not appropriate for us to condemn or commend the whole project. We have stated the parts of the proposal that we are opposed to, and, as a result, much of that has been changed. If the project goes ahead, we will be there every step of the way, trying to ensure positive outcomes on each of the issues we have identified.

If Harpswell residents approve the lease, Friends of Casco Bay is committed to remaining involved for the long-term, as a watchdog and advocate, nagging, prodding, and, if necessary, intervening legally, to protect Casco Bay.

If you have questions about any of the issues we have identified, call me at 799-8574.

Joe Payne

Casco Baykeeper

Friends of Casco Bay

Home ] Up ]
Bob Ring Comments ] B & P letter ] CA Energy Commission ] frwds/files/carlsbad.pdf ] Chebeague Letter ] Nikiski Fire Chief ] Chris Hall ] Cliff Goudey ] Enviros ] frwds/files/fayrep1.gif ] frwds/files/fayrep2.jpg ] frwds/files/fayrep3.jpg ] Fay Report ] Financial Impact ] Fishing Proposal ] FOCB LNG ] [ FOCB Update ] FOCB LNG doc ] Fuel Depot Committee ] Ginger Connolly ] Cheryl Golek ] Golek 2 ] Golek 3 and 4 ] Golek 5 ] Golek 6 ] Golek7 - Algers explosion ] Weil/Taylor email ] LNG leaving Harpswell ] Kenai Report.doc ] Kenai Report ] Kevin White 1 ] Kevin White 2 ] Kevin White 3 ] Kevin White 5 ] Kevin White 6 ] Kevin White 7 ] Kevin White-8 FAQ ] John Loyd's Alaska Report- html ] Mr Loyd's Letter to Editor of TR ] Departed Portland, Maine on Wednesday, November 5, 2003 with Walter Norton and Dana McIntyre ] Loyd-R Weil ] Loyd-R Weil with comments ] Maria Sophia Tufts ] Rob McAleer ] Ntulankeyutmonen Nkihtaqmikon ] Public Records ] Robert White ] An Alaskan ] Ms. Weil refute of Mr Loyd ] Executive Summary ] Riley Movie ] Tim Riley ]
Files about Fairwinds ] Fairwind Comments - current ] Fairwind Comments 2 ] Fairwind Comments 10/03 -2/04 ] Fairwinds FAQ ] Fast Facts (from Fairwinds) ] Fairwinds-Interesting Facts ] Links ] Links Other Places ] What's New ] What's New -2 ] News Articles ] Overheard ]
Last edited on 08/01/2008